{"id":1747,"date":"2026-10-27T10:30:00","date_gmt":"2026-10-27T16:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/?p=1747"},"modified":"2026-10-26T10:41:38","modified_gmt":"2026-10-26T16:41:38","slug":"quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/en\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\/","title":{"rendered":"Appeals court upholds detaining immigrants without bond hearings in Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi"},"content":{"rendered":"

The full Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on October 23, 2026, that people detained under section 1225(b)(2)(A) of immigration law have no constitutional right to a bond hearing, according to the court opinion<\/a>. The case, identified as Sosnava Rodriguez (No. 26-50183), was consolidated with two others.<\/p>\n

What the court decided<\/h2>\n

The majority concluded that the three petitioners were never \u201cadmitted\u201d into the country. It therefore treats them as applicants for admission under section 1225 and holds that they cannot demand more process than Congress provided in that statute. According to the ruling, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detained all three after a traffic stop.<\/p>\n

The court also declined to treat the six-month mark in a Supreme Court precedent as a fixed limit on detention before deportation. To reach that conclusion, it relied on its own earlier decision, Buenrostro-Mendez v. Bondi, from 2026.<\/p>\n

How the case got here<\/h2>\n

On July 2, 2026, a three-judge panel of the same circuit had granted a habeas petition in favor of the detainees and found that detention becomes unconstitutional when it is prolonged unreasonably without a bond hearing. On July 10, a majority of the circuit\u2019s judges voted to rehear the case en banc, which vacated the panel\u2019s opinion.<\/p>\n

The October 23 decision reverses that result. The Fifth Circuit covers Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi, so the ruling applies to federal courts in those three states.<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court is already reviewing the underlying question<\/h2>\n

On October 1, 2026, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case Rhoney v. Barbosa da Cunha (No. 26-104)<\/a>. The question presented is whether section 1225(b)(2)(A) requires detaining people who are in the U.S. without having been admitted while deportation proceedings are pending.<\/p>\n

That case comes from the Second Circuit, which ruled against the government on April 28, 2026. As of October 5 there was no decision on the merits, and no date for oral argument has been confirmed. Appeals courts have not resolved the question uniformly: the Supreme Court\u2019s decision will determine whether the Fifth Circuit\u2019s or the Second Circuit\u2019s approach prevails.<\/p>\n

\"Corte
Archive photo (2007): building of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. Bobak Ha'Eri \/ Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 3.0)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

What does it mean to you?<\/h2>\n
    \n
  • If you live in Texas, Louisiana, or Mississippi and ICE detains someone who entered without being admitted, that court will no longer require a bond hearing solely because of the time the person has been detained.<\/li>\n
  • The ruling is not the last word: the Supreme Court must decide the underlying question in case 26-104.<\/li>\n
  • In other circuits, the rules may differ. What applies to a person depends on their case and where they are detained.<\/li>\n
  • This note explains the general rule and is not legal advice. If you or a family member are detained, consult an immigration attorney or an accredited legal services organization.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    Legal notice:<\/strong> This information is general and does not replace the advice of a licensed immigration attorney or a representative accredited by the Department of Justice.<\/em><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    The full Fifth Circuit ruled on October 23 that people who entered without being admitted have no constitutional right to bond. The Supreme Court is reviewing the same legal question.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1748,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_oxygen_hide_in_design_set":false,"_oxygen_tags":"","_cabeceras_dek":"El pleno del Quinto Circuito fall\u00f3 el 23 de octubre que quienes entraron sin ser admitidos no tienen derecho constitucional a fianza. La Corte Suprema revisa la misma cuesti\u00f3n legal.","_cabeceras_official_sources":[{"name":"Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, opinion No. 26-50183","url":"https:\/\/www.ca5.uscourts.gov\/opinions\/pub\/26\/26-50183-CV1.pdf"},{"name":"U.S. Supreme Court, question presented No. 26-104","url":"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/qp\/26-00104qp.pdf"},{"name":"www.ca5.uscourts.gov","url":"https:\/\/www.ca5.uscourts.gov\/opinions"},{"name":"www.supremecourt.gov","url":"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/search.aspx?filename=\/docket\/docketfiles\/html\/public\/26-104.html"}],"_cabeceras_claims":[{"claim":"El 23 de octubre de 2026, el pleno del Quinto Circuito resolvi\u00f3 que las personas detenidas bajo 8 U.S.C. 1225(b)(2)(A) no tienen derecho constitucional a una audiencia de fianza.","support":["F1"],"unknown":[],"status":"ok"},{"claim":"El caso es Sosnava Rodriguez, No. 26-50183, consolidado con otros dos casos.","support":["F1"],"unknown":[],"status":"ok"},{"claim":"La mayor\u00eda consider\u00f3 que los peticionarios nunca fueron admitidos y son solicitantes de admisi\u00f3n bajo la secci\u00f3n 1225.","support":["F1"],"unknown":[],"status":"ok"},{"claim":"El tribunal no tom\u00f3 la marca de seis meses de un precedente de la Corte Suprema como l\u00edmite fijo a la detenci\u00f3n previa a la deportaci\u00f3n.","support":["F1"],"unknown":[],"status":"ok"},{"claim":"El 2 de julio de 2026 un panel hab\u00eda confirmado un amparo y el 10 de julio una mayor\u00eda vot\u00f3 revisar el caso en pleno, anulando la opini\u00f3n del panel.","support":["F1"],"unknown":[],"status":"ok"},{"claim":"El 1 de octubre de 2026 la Corte Suprema acept\u00f3 revisar Rhoney v. Barbosa da Cunha (No. 26-104) sobre si la secci\u00f3n 1225(b)(2)(A) obliga a detener a personas no admitidas.","support":["F2"],"unknown":[],"status":"ok"},{"claim":"El caso 26-104 viene del Segundo Circuito, que fall\u00f3 contra el gobierno el 28 de abril de 2026.","support":["F2"],"unknown":[],"status":"ok"}],"tla_reel_url":"","_tla_reel_video":1972,"_tla_reel_video_fb":1974,"_tla_reel_portada":1973,"_tla_reel_programado":0,"_tla_reel_copy":"\u00bfDetenido por ICE en Texas? Sin audiencia de fianza\n\nNota completa: https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\/\n\n#Inmigraci\u00f3n #ICE #LatinosEnEEUU","footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[94,644,136,98,439],"class_list":["post-1747","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-asilo-cortes","tag-corte-suprema","tag-detencion-de-inmigrantes","tag-fianza","tag-ice","tag-quinto-circuito"],"yoast_head":"\nQuinto Circuito avala detenci\u00f3n sin fianza a inmigrantes<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"El pleno del Quinto Circuito fall\u00f3 10-7 que los inmigrantes no admitidos no tienen derecho constitucional a fianza. La Corte Suprema revisa el tema.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/en\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Quinto Circuito avala detenci\u00f3n sin fianza a inmigrantes\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"El pleno del Quinto Circuito fall\u00f3 10-7 que los inmigrantes no admitidos no tienen derecho constitucional a fianza. La Corte Suprema revisa el tema.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/en\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Latin Americans\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=61595765931718\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-10-27T16:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/ilustracion-1747-YN72Lw.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"900\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Redacci\u00f3n The Latin Americans\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Redacci\u00f3n The Latin Americans\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/en\\\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Redacci\u00f3n The Latin Americans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/71ca151e3bc12e4ab7a3e3cb39b2adce\"},\"headline\":\"Corte de Apelaciones avala detener a inmigrantes sin audiencia de fianza en Texas, Luisiana y Misisipi\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-10-27T16:30:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/en\\\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":608,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/ilustracion-1747-YN72Lw.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Corte Suprema\",\"detenci\u00f3n de inmigrantes\",\"fianza\",\"ICE\",\"Quinto Circuito\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Asilo y cortes\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/en\\\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/en\\\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\\\/\",\"name\":\"Quinto Circuito avala detenci\u00f3n sin fianza a inmigrantes\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/ilustracion-1747-YN72Lw.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-10-27T16:30:00+00:00\",\"description\":\"El pleno del Quinto Circuito fall\u00f3 10-7 que los inmigrantes no admitidos no tienen derecho constitucional a fianza. La Corte Suprema revisa el tema.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/en\\\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/en\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/ilustracion-1747-YN72Lw.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/ilustracion-1747-YN72Lw.jpg\",\"width\":1600,\"height\":900,\"caption\":\"Foto de archivo (2006): manifestantes con una bandera de EE.UU. en una marcha por la. Britt Selvitelle from San Francisco \\\/ Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 2.0)\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/en\\\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Portada\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Corte de Apelaciones avala detener a inmigrantes sin audiencia de fianza en Texas, Luisiana y Misisipi\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"The Latin Americans\",\"description\":\"Clear information for living in the United States\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"TLA\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"The Latin Americans\",\"alternateName\":\"TLA\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/icono-512.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/icono-512.png\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"The Latin Americans\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/profile.php?id=61595765931718\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/71ca151e3bc12e4ab7a3e3cb39b2adce\",\"name\":\"Redacci\u00f3n The Latin Americans\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/icono-512-150x150.png\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/icono-512-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/icono-512-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Redacci\u00f3n The Latin Americans\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thelatinamericans.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Fifth Circuit upholds detention without bail for immigrants","description":"The en banc Fifth Circuit ruled 10-7 that noncitizens not admitted have no constitutional right to bail. The Supreme Court is reviewing the issue.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/en\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Quinto Circuito avala detenci\u00f3n sin fianza a inmigrantes","og_description":"El pleno del Quinto Circuito fall\u00f3 10-7 que los inmigrantes no admitidos no tienen derecho constitucional a fianza. La Corte Suprema revisa el tema.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/en\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\/","og_site_name":"The Latin Americans","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=61595765931718","article_published_time":"2026-10-27T16:30:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1600,"height":900,"url":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/ilustracion-1747-YN72Lw.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Redacci\u00f3n The Latin Americans","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Redacci\u00f3n The Latin Americans","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/en\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\/"},"author":{"name":"Redacci\u00f3n The Latin Americans","@id":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/#\/schema\/person\/71ca151e3bc12e4ab7a3e3cb39b2adce"},"headline":"Corte de Apelaciones avala detener a inmigrantes sin audiencia de fianza en Texas, Luisiana y Misisipi","datePublished":"2026-10-27T16:30:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/en\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\/"},"wordCount":608,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/ilustracion-1747-YN72Lw.jpg","keywords":["Corte Suprema","detenci\u00f3n de inmigrantes","fianza","ICE","Quinto Circuito"],"articleSection":["Asilo y cortes"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/en\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\/","url":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/en\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\/","name":"Fifth Circuit upholds detention without bail for immigrants","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/ilustracion-1747-YN72Lw.jpg","datePublished":"2026-10-27T16:30:00+00:00","description":"The en banc Fifth Circuit ruled 10-7 that noncitizens not admitted have no constitutional right to bail. The Supreme Court is reviewing the issue.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/en\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/ilustracion-1747-YN72Lw.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/ilustracion-1747-YN72Lw.jpg","width":1600,"height":900,"caption":"Foto de archivo (2006): manifestantes con una bandera de EE.UU. en una marcha por la. Britt Selvitelle from San Francisco \/ Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 2.0)"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/en\/quinto-circuito-detencion-sin-fianza-inmigrantes\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Portada","item":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Corte de Apelaciones avala detener a inmigrantes sin audiencia de fianza en Texas, Luisiana y Misisipi"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/en\/","name":"The Latin Americans","description":"Clear information for living in the United States","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/#organization"},"alternateName":"TLA","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/en\/#organization","name":"The Latin Americans","alternateName":"TLA","url":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/icono-512.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/icono-512.png","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"The Latin Americans"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=61595765931718"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/71ca151e3bc12e4ab7a3e3cb39b2adce","name":"The Latin Americans editorial team","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/icono-512-150x150.png","url":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/icono-512-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/icono-512-150x150.png","caption":"Redacci\u00f3n The Latin Americans"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1747","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1747"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1747\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1750,"href":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1747\/revisions\/1750"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1748"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1747"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1747"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thelatinamericans.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1747"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}